Goon









| Directed by: | Michael Dowse |
|---|---|
| Written by: | Jay Baruchel, Evan Golberg |
| Cast: | Jay Baruchel, Seann William Scott, Liev Schreiber, Kim Coates, Eugene Levy |
| Studio: | Magnet Releasing |
| Genre: | Comedy |
| Official Site: | www.magnetreleasing.com/goon/ |
There’s a kind of unwritten rule when it comes to sports films that says they should be about more than just the sport. There are, of course, exceptions to this rule. Take last year’s excellent sports drama “Moneyball” for example. There we had a film about how to put together a great baseball team which was all about the sport. Most of the time however, sports films deal with larger issues such as those tackled in “Remember the Titans” or “The Blind Side.” Now we have the hockey film “Goon,” which doesn’t attempt to do anything of the sort.
Doug Glatt (Seann William Scott) is a bouncer at a bar. He comes from a family that has all made something of themselves by becoming doctors. One night, while at a hockey game, one of the players attempts to attack his best friend Ryan (Jay Baruchel) because of his taunts, but Doug stops the player in his tracks and beats him unconscious. This captures the attention of the head coach of the Orangetown Assassins. He eventually turns Doug over to the head coach of the Halifax Highlanders, who wants to put him on the team to guard a player, Xavier Laflamme (Marc-Andre Grondin), who has lost his confidence after being hit really hard in a previous game. Doug quickly earns a reputation as a strong fighter and eventually gives his team something they’ve been dreaming of: a shot at the playoffs.
Now you’re probably asking yourself: Why would a movie like this get made? Even after the movie was over, I found myself asking that very question. What was the point of it all? Not that it has to have a message of some kind, but if the filmmakers couldn’t accomplish the basic goals they set for themselves, why bother with it?
They obviously wanted to make a film that was entertaining, but this film is about as entertaining as watching two people beat each other up, which is ironically as far as the plot ever gets. Why did the writers, Jay Burachel and Evan Goldberg, ever think that this would make for an entertaining film? If they had at least made it about the sport, perhaps it would have been more interesting, but by focusing the story on a man who just beats the snot out of people on the ice rink, they remove any entertainment and purpose from the film.
Something else the writers obviously wanted to make was a comedy. The film does have sporadically humorous moments, but nothing that was laugh out loud funny. There’s certainly not enough funny material to fill even its short runtime of about 85 minutes. Unfortunately, most of the humor they try to get away with is on the Sandler level, pertaining of references to genitals and such. Luckily, they begin to lay off the humor almost entirely throughout the second half of the film, but it’s unclear if that was their intention or not. It could have been due to the fact that most of the film simply isn’t funny.
The film leads up to a very anticlimactic ending. As mentioned before, the story concentrates on Doug as he beats up player after player in various games, so the writers decided to make the climax a big showdown between Doug and another fighter of his caliber, Ross Rhea (Liev Schreiber). This also just happens to be the game that determines whether or not the team will advance to the playoffs. So the fight and the match play out (you can probably guess what happens in each) and the film ends, leaving us to ponder what happens afterward. My guess is that most people just won’t care.
The most interesting thing about the film is Seann William Scott’s blank performance in the lead. Known mostly for the “American Pie” films, all he has to do here is play dumb and go along with what his coach tells him to do. There’s also a romance thrown in between his character and Eva (Alison Pill) that never develops and ends up being completely superfluous to the story. It was a nice try to develop the character further, but in order for that to happen, the plotline would actually have to develop too.
What we end up with is a film that just isn’t interesting, entertaining, or funny. If the writers wanted to concentrate on Doug’s story, they desperately needed to add something more to it to make it work, like they tried to do with his undeveloped relationship with Eva. Perhaps they could have tried to concentrate on the team as a whole so as to incorporate Doug’s story into theirs. At least that way the plot wouldn’t seem like it was put together by drunken hockey fans. 2/4 stars.
The comparison wasn't meant to be taken as though they were actually similar films, but just to show that good sports films tend to be about more than just the sport. Goon wasn't about anything more than the sport, making it rather uninteresting, and as I stated in my review, it was obviously trying to be a comedy, but it just didn't pull it off very well.
Comparing those movies to Goon and saying those were 'good' and Goon was bad because it didn't do what they did doesn't really make sense as sure they all have elements of sports in them, but that's like listing a bunch of black comedies and then listing a bunch of slapstick comedies, then labelling the black comedies as 'good' and the slapstick as 'bad' just because they don't focus on what black comedies focus on -- I mean they're just two different subgenres. It doesn't make sense to compare them because while they share similar elements, overall they're vastly different from one another with totally different goals (like I said if you didn't think it accomplished those goals it set out to succeed in then that's cool, I just feel like Goon shouldn't be looked at as a sports drama, because it's not, it should be looked at and judged as something different, as a sports comedy).
If you prefer one subgenre over the other that's alright, but it seemed like you were comparing/judging it as if it were in the same subgenre as those movies you listed, instead of the one it's actually in (along with movies like The Waterboy, Blades of Glory, Kicking and Screaming, Semi-Pro, etc.)
and I hate to nag but Goon really wasn't about the sport at all, it was about Doug, his journey and his new job. Miracle is a movie about the actual sport, whereas Goon is just a movie about a guy and his new job and what he goes through. It's not really about a team or about the game, that's more just the background of his personal story/journey than anything I found
As I pointed out, it wasn't meant to be taken as them actually being similar (i.e. in genre or ideas), but the comparison between these different sports films is certainly valid in that those films did something much more interesting than Goon in that they went beyond the foundation of their respective sports. I'm not putting them in the same subgenre, but rather just pointing out that Goon didn't do anything beyond its foundation (hockey), making it rather dull and uninteresting. I hope that clears it up a little. On a side note, in a comparison with its own subgenre, Goon was better than those awful films you listed in your comment as it actually had a few amusing moments.








to each their own but I think you took the movie the wrong way... I mean, Remember the Titans, The Blind Side, Moneyball? This movie has about as much to do with those as it does with Lord of the Rings. It was never intended to be a sports drama, it was first and foremost intended to be a comedy, and that's what it is -- just set in the world of hockey. As stated the film isn't about hockey, it's about Doug and his role as an enforcer (or 'goon') and that's exactly what we get and if you think about it, it's exactly what we should've expected to get from it just by the title and synopsis alone.